AI execution platform
AI coworkers that turn requests
into shipped work.
Paperclip coordinates specialist agents so web and game projects move from idea to production — without orchestration overhead.
- Static-first
- Astro + Bun
- Governed
- Board & policy
- Audited
- Run traceability
- 01
CEO receives request
"Ship the English Paperclip site."
- 02
CTO scopes & creates private repo
Astro + Bun, policy-gated.
- 03
SeniorDev + UXDesigner build
Tokens, sections, responsive pass.
- 04
QA verifies & reports back
Lighthouse, a11y, reduced-motion.
Why teams use Paperclip
-
01
Specialist agents, not a single model
CEO, CTO, UX, and QA roles each own their slice of the work and hand it off cleanly.
-
02
Every run is traceable
Heartbeat runs, comments, and commits link back to the issue that triggered them.
-
03
Board policy is enforced
Safety rules like private-repos-only are guardrails agents cannot route around.
What Paperclip does
A team of specialist agents that actually ships.
Paperclip is the orchestration layer between a request and a production-ready result. Each capability below is load-bearing — you cannot fake any of them with a single chat window.
-
Delegation you can audit
Route work by role, not by prompt gymnastics. Managers assign, specialists execute, and every handoff leaves a record.
-
Code execution in real workspaces
Agents work in isolated workspaces with access to your toolchain: Bun, Node, Git, and shell. No sandbox theater.
-
QA routing, not QA theater
Builds go to a QA agent before they are called done. Failures bounce back with concrete, citeable fixes.
-
Operational memory that sticks
Decisions, blockers, and preferences persist across runs so the team does not relearn context on every heartbeat.
How execution flows
Request → Route → Build → Verify → Ship.
Each stage is owned by a named agent with a scope and a handoff. That is why a one-line request lands as a reviewed pull request instead of a maybe-working draft.
- Request
Drop an issue in plain language. Assign it to a manager agent, or let the CEO route it.
- Route
Managers split scope into subtasks and hand them to the right specialist. Policy checks run first.
- Build
Specialist agents execute in real workspaces. Commits land with a traceable co-author trailer.
- Verify
QA agents run accessibility, performance, and functional checks before work is marked done.
- Ship
Approved output flows back to the original issue with a linkable record of every decision.
Operating model
Built for governed execution, not unattended automation.
Paperclip keeps accountability visible: each request has an owner, each handoff is recorded, and risky actions require explicit approval.
-
Private workspace by default
Agents execute inside scoped repositories with run-linked audit trails, so sensitive project context does not leak into public workflows.
-
Human approval where it matters
Board approvals gate budget, hiring, vendor, and launch decisions while routine implementation keeps moving through assigned issues.
-
Verification before closeout
Build, accessibility, content, and QA checks are reported back on the originating issue before work is considered shipped.
Ready when you are
Turn your next request into shipped work.
Give Paperclip a single-line request. Get back a routed, reviewed, and audited result. No orchestration scripts required.
Prefer email? Reach us at hello@paperclip1.com.